Mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are sending $10.2 billion to the U.S. Treasury after reporting combined first-quarter profits of $9.3 billion.
But Thursday’s earnings reports hinted at a possible cooling off in the profits of both companies, which have benefited from large one-time gains over the past several quarters. They also suggested a modestly softer housing demand. Here are five takeaways:
Fannie reported pre-tax income of $7.9 billion, of which $4.1 billion came in legal settlements that aren’t likely to be repeated. Freddie reported pre-tax income of $5.8 billion, with $4.9 billion in legal settlements.
In recent quarters, the companies have also benefited from a big rebound in home prices. The rebound has allowed them to release reserves as expected losses failed to materialize and to reclaim certain tax benefits that had been written down in 2008. The tax benefits alone accounted for roughly half of profits last year. Executives at both firms acknowledged that earnings in 2014 were likely to be substantially lower than last year.
Nevertheless, Fannie and Freddie will have sent $213 billion to Treasury by the end of June, around $26 billion more than the amount the Treasury sunk into both companies.
2SHIFTING BUSINESS
The companies are also facing much lower mortgage production volumes after the number of homeowners refinancing their mortgages plunged following last summer’s jump up in interest rates.
Fannie and Freddie’s core businesses consist primarily of two activities: insuring mortgages that are packaged into bonds, and investing in mortgages directly. The latter business, once the source of huge profits but also greater volatility, is being wound down. The loan-guarantee business will account for a greater part of the business going forward, and some analysts say guarantee fees would need to rise to make that business more attractive to private investors who have argued that the firms should be recapitalized.
If Freddie faced capital standards comparable to what exists for other large banks or insurance companies, loan-guarantee fees today would “earn a return that is less than what private investors would want by a modest amount,” said Donald Layton, the company’s CEO.
3SOFTER HOUSING
Fannie’s inventory of foreclosed homes grew from the year-earlier level for the first time since 2011. Though the 102,398 foreclosed properties it held at the end of March was down slightly from the end of last year, it was up 0.9% from a year earlier, a sign that there has been less demand from buyers at current prices. “The level of activity has declined somewhat,” said Fannie CEO Timothy Mayopoulos on a call with reporters Thursday. Investors, which had been scarfing up foreclosed homes, have retreated because “there aren’t as many bargains out there as there used to be,” he said.
On average, Fannie sold foreclosed homes for 73.8% of the underlying loan balance during the first quarter. That was up from 70.6% a year earlier but down for the second straight quarter.
Lenders have begun to ease credit standards slightly as loan production falls. Banks, though, are being “thoughtful and cautious in how they go about doing that,” said Mr. Mayopoulos. “The loans that people are delivering to us are of very high quality,” he added. The average credit score backed by Fannie stood at 740 at the end of March, down from 751 a year earlier. Some 1.8% of loans backed by Fannie had credit scores below 620, compared to 1% two years earlier.
740The average credit score backed by Fannie at the end of March.
The terms of the companies’ government backing require Fannie and Freddie to send almost all of their profits to the Treasury, though they don’t owe anything if they run a loss. Investors have sued the companies to challenge those terms, which have depleted them of capital. The arrangement, which took effect last year, has created “a challenging situation for us,” said Mr. Mayopoulos. “We are running a $3 trillion balance sheet with very, very little capital retained earnings.”
Meanwhile, a top Treasury adviser gave a speech Thursday to remind investors that much of what Fannie and Freddie have done wouldn’t be possible without such extraordinary government assistance. Not enough attention is paid “to the extraordinary value of Treasury’s continued capital support which allows the [companies] to borrow at very low cost, more akin to sovereign rates than those of a private company issuing corporate debt,” said Michael Stegman, the adviser, at a conference for municipal-bond analysts in Orlando.
The US housing finance system works just fine From Mr Chris Lafakis. Sir, Edward Luce (“ Hedge funds are testing the quality of US democracy ” (Comment, May 12) paints the investors’ lawsuit against the US government on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as a righteous struggle between noble American democracy and the evil lords of Wall Street. Should we not question the authority of the US government to confiscate the profits of any company, including one that it bailed out, by fiat decree? The US government would not have dared to do this to AIG because it knows it would have lost in court. Banks, regulators and Congress were just as indispensable to the financial crisis as the government-sponsored enterprises. So why should the GSEs alone be taken to task? More I Mr Luce and virtually every commentator or politician who opines on this issue, including President Barack Obama, wants the US to unilaterally disarm one of its greatest sources of comparative advantage: cheap, ...
Why I Bought Shares of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac By Alexander MacLennan | More Articles May 20, 2014 | Comments (3) This article is part of a series of articles that looks at Fannie Mae ( NASDAQOTCBB: FNMA ) and Freddie Mac ( NASDAQOTCBB: FMCC ) from an investment perspective. To read the full analysis, click here . Until solid profits started to show at Fannie and Freddie, the common stock was priced for liquidation trading at around $0.30. But even as the profits started to appear, big investors like Fairholme Funds and Perry Capital purchased the preferred stock. It was only late last year that the common stock received major interest from a major investor when Bill Ackman bought nearly 10% of the outstanding shares of each GSE. The potential Trading in the $4 range, shares of Fannie and Freddie have a lot of potential upside ...
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The regulator of government-controlled mortgage finance firms Fannie Mae ( FNMA ) and Freddie Mac ( FMCC ) said on Sunday he would not oppose them having a smaller presence in the market but private capital had to be ready to take over first. Watt said last week, in his first public speech since taking office, that he did not want to shrink Fannie and Freddie's footprint, marking a sharp departure from his predecessor.Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Mel Watt said the two companies, which own or guarantee about 60 percent of all U.S. home loans, needed to remain in the housing finance market to make sure it was liquid and resilient. "It's not that I'm opposed to it and we will certainly allow it to happen," he told C-SPAN's "Newsmakers" program, when asked about the prospect of shrinking the lenders' activities. "But if the private sector is not ready to step into the space, and you shrink what Fannie and...
Comments
Post a Comment