Fannie & Freddy AFTER YEARS STILL IN SERIOUS DOUBT@ FULL STAGE -ON WHATS NEXT



Summary

By Parke Shall with Thom Lachenmann
We think that new revelations made by Steven Mnuchin and missed by most of the financial analysts reveal new clues to the future of Fannie (OTCQB:FNMA) and Freddie (OTCQB:FMCC). We think comments he made last week in interviews not only confirm that Fannie and Freddie won't be under government control much longer ??????????, but also that it could still be a couple of months before action takes place. Until then, we expect to see an appeal of last week's court decision; a decision that came with some scathing dissent despite not falling in favor of shareholders (for the most part).
Anybody who was even in the slightest bit involved with the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac debacle was likely watching carefully yesterday as Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin took to some of the financial news networks in order to help disseminate what has been going on at the White House with regard to the American economy. You can watch clips from his appearances here and here.
Mnuchin's comments on CNBC were bullish for shareholders, as he answered Becky Quick,
(our emphasis in bold)
We think the comments that he gave were generally bullish for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shareholders and we took from the interview that it may just take a little bit of time, but that the Fannie and Freddie bull case is still very much on the table.
Mnuchin didn't speak much about Fannie and Freddie but he was peppered with a couple of questions during each of the two interviews that he gave. His answers were relatively consistent with one another on both networks.
He did spend a lot of time talking about the administration's plans for tax cuts for both the American people and businesses. This dominated a good majority of his time and he made it clear that tax cuts were his number one priority right now. There is no doubt that the administration, from a financial perspective, is focused on tax cuts right now and Mnuchin made the commentary that meaningful effects of these tax cuts would likely not be felt in 2017. However, he did reiterate several times that the tax cuts are going to need to be dealt with, simplified, and rolled out before he can move onto housing reform.
However, when speaking about housing reform, he did make some fairly bullish comments. He made it clear on both networks that he was committed to housing reform and with regard to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, he made the comment that he wanted to make sure there was a lot of liquidity in the 30 year mortgage market.
On Fox Business News, his comments were equally as bullish when he stated,
He reiterated a sentiment that he had previously stated, which is that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac cannot stay under government control for the next four years. This, in and of it's self, should be encouraging for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac investors as it is a clear sign that he wants to take action. We are guessing, based on how long it is going to take to get the tax plan done that housing reform would likely come at the end of summer or the beginning of fall of this year. While Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shareholders may have to wait for a couple more months, it may wind up being well worth it. That is not also to suggest the details of a potential plan may not leak out over the next couple of weeks.
Mnuchin said that he had met with Mel Watt and it is clear that housing reform and the government sponsored entities are on his priority list. The only reasonable conclusion that we can draw from the fact that Mnuchin said he wanted more liquidity, but also wanted to be safe around the taxpayers, would be a substantial capital buffer that the government sponsored entities would need. This would come from the issuance of new securities and would likely wind up as part of a recapitalization that sees preferred shares already outstanding appreciate significantly. Common shares may also wind up appreciating depending on the details of a recap.
The bottom line is this. The decision that came down last week could very well be appealed and taken to the Supreme Court. The argument of whether or not this is a constitutional issue doesn't even come close to preventing this case from going to the Supreme Court. We strongly believe that this is a constitutional issue and we strongly believe that this case is going to be appealed as quickly as humanly possible.
When the case is appealed, Judge Brown's dissent is going to be extremely important. We believe the plaintiffs have an outstanding chance in appellate court of trying to get this decision overturned.
All of the GSE stocks finished the week looking a little stronger than they did early in the week, especially a lot of the preferred class of shares. We believe the strength to be the "smoke clearing" after a brutal week and a decision that we believe to be somewhat misinterpreted. We don't think that the public understands that there are still many options for Fannie and Freddie shareholders to win aside from this one legal battle. There are additional outstanding lawsuits and there is also Steve Mnuchin, who pretty much has full control over the situation.
Finally, we just have the common sense angle wherein we are not sure that Mnuchin would be able to simply stiff arm guys like Berkowitz and Paulson, who are hedge fund allies of his. We think he gets a deal done that is beneficial to both of these fund managers, who own a substantial amount of preferred stock.
We're optimistic about the future as Fannie and Freddie shareholders.
I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.
Editor's Note: This article discusses one or more securities that do not trade on a major U.S. exchange. Please be aware of the risks associated with these stocks.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Image
TAKEAWAYS  ON FANNIE,  FREDDIE EARNINGS Mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are sending $10.2 billion to the U.S. Treasury after reporting combined first-quarter profits of $9.3 billion. But Thursday’s earnings reports hinted at a possible cooling off in the profits of both companies, which have benefited from large one-time gains over the past several quarters. They also suggested a modestly softer housing demand. Here are five takeaways: 8 MAY 2014 6:17PM BY   NICK TIMIRAOS   CONNECT 1 BIG ONE TIME GAINS Share on Twitter Fannie reported pre-tax income of $7.9 billion, of which $4.1 billion came in legal settlements that aren’t likely to be repeated. Freddie reported pre-tax income of $5.8 billion, with $4.9 billion in legal settlements. In recent quarters, the companies have also benefited from a big rebound in home prices. The rebound has allowed them to release reserves as expected losses failed to materialize and to re...
Read more

The US housing finance system works just fine

The US housing finance system works just fine From Mr Chris Lafakis. Sir, Edward Luce (“ Hedge funds are testing the quality of US democracy ” (Comment, May 12) paints the investors’ lawsuit against the US government on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as a righteous struggle between noble American democracy and the evil lords of Wall Street. Should we not question the authority of the US government to confiscate the profits of any company, including one that it bailed out, by fiat decree? The US government would not have dared to do this to AIG because it knows it would have lost in court. Banks, regulators and Congress were just as indispensable to the financial crisis as the government-sponsored enterprises. So why should the GSEs alone be taken to task? More I Mr Luce and virtually every commentator or politician who opines on this issue, including President Barack Obama, wants the US to unilaterally disarm one of its greatest sources of comparative advantage: cheap, ...
Read more

Court Forces Government to Release Documents in Fannie/Freddie Suit

Great read by Horowitz Court Forces Government to Release Documents in Fannie/Freddie Suit Submitted by Carl Horowitz on Fri, 07/25/2014 - 14:50 Printer-friendlyPrinter- friendlyEmail to friendEmail to friend The burden carried by the holders of stock in mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, each operating for nearly six years under federal conservatorship, just got lighter. On July 16, U.S. Court of Federal Claims Judge Margaret Sweeney, in a procedural ruling, held that shareholder-plaintiffs in Fairholme Funds Inc. et al. v. United States are entitled to know material facts that the government wants to keep secret. The shareholders are seeking compensation for foregone income resulting from the Treasury Department's "sweep" rule of August 2012, which forced the companies to forward all dividends to the department in perpetuity. Government lawyers had filed a motion for a protective order on  May 30 to inhibit discovery. The outcome of this case will hav...
Read more